<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 29 May 2012 03:43:11 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>A Bankruptcy Killer-Pay Back Money Paid By Debtor</title><link>http://www.nash-law.com/a-bankruptcy-killer-pay-back/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>A Bankruptcy Killer-Pay Back Money Paid By Debtor</title><dc:creator>Nash Law Firm</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:01:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.nash-law.com/a-bankruptcy-killer-pay-back/2011/1/14/a-bankruptcy-killer-pay-back-money-paid-by-debtor.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">768688:9132418:10063029</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">09.15</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">.10</span></span></p>
<p>By: Stephen J. Nash<br />Nash Law Firm PLLC<span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><br /><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="mailto:nash@nash-law.com" target="_self"><span><span style="font-size: x-small;">nash@</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">nash-law</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">.com</span></span></a></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a class="twitter-share-button" href="http://twitter.com/share">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></span></span></span></span></p>
<p>Nobody wants to get caught up in a bankruptcy, but with a record number of bankruptcy filings, it becomes more and more likely that you will have to deal with bankruptcy.&nbsp;&nbsp;Everyone knows that a debt owed to you can get wiped out by a bankruptcy, but did you know that the bankruptcy court can actually seek the return of money already paid to you?</p>
<p><strong><span><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">When Can the Bankruptcy Court Require a Creditor to Pay Back Money Received from the Bankrupt Debtor?</span></span></strong></p>
<p>The&nbsp;Bankruptcy Code permits a trustee or a debtor in possession to recover certain payments made to creditors prior to the filing of the bankruptcy. &nbsp;The policy behind this statute is to prevent some creditors being treated better than others.</p>
<p>If the bankruptcy court determines that the payment was a preference, the payment can be recovered.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">Ninety Day Preference</span></strong></p>
<p>Preferences are defined in Bankruptcy Code Section 547 as:</p>
<ol>
<li>Payment on an antecedent debt (as opposed to a current debt);</li>
<li>Made while the debtor was insolvent;</li>
<li>To a non-insider creditor within 90 days of the filing of the bankruptcy;</li>
<li>That allows the creditor to receive more of its claim than it would have had the payment not been made and the claim was paid through the bankruptcy process.</li>
</ol>
<p>The process of recovering preferences is sometimes referred to as a "clawback".&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">Defenses to a Clawback&nbsp;</span></strong></p>
<p>The defenses to the recovery of a preference are set out in Bankruptcy Code 547(c) as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>contemporaneous exchanges;&nbsp;</li>
<li>payments made in the ordinary course of the business of the debtor and the creditor on ordinary business terms;&nbsp; and</li>
<li>security interests that secure debts that bring new value to the debtor.</li>
<li>amounts of subsequent credit extended and unpaid.</li>
</ul>
<p>The burden of proof rests with the creditor to prove that they fall under a preference defense. &nbsp;In some cases, every creditor who received a payment within the 90 day period will be required to establish a valid defense. &nbsp;If you as a creditor receive such a notice, it is extremely important that you consult with a knowledgeable attorney so that a proper response can be timely made.</p>
<p>The policy behind the 90 day preference rule is to treat all creditors the same, to lessen the advantage a creditor might get from aggressively pursuing old debt and to prevent the debtor from preferring one creditor over another. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">One Year Preference</span></strong></p>
<p>When insiders receive payments on old debts within one year of the bankruptcy filing, the bankruptcy code permits recovery of these payments. &nbsp;</p>
<p>An insider includes relatives, corporate officers or directors or related entities. &nbsp;In a insider preference action there is no presumption that the debtor was insolvent when the payment in question was made. &nbsp;The burden of proof of insolvency rests with the trustee.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The policy behind insider preferences is to prevent the debtor from paying relatives and business decision makers at the expense of the trade creditors. &nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">Why All Businesses Should Be Concerned With Bankruptcy Preference Claims</span></span></strong></p>
<p>You never know when a preference claim may come knocking on your door. &nbsp;Since you cannot predict which of your debtors, if any, will file bankruptcy any payment you received from any debtor may be subject to a bankruptcy preference claim down the road and by the time the claim is made the money received is long gone.</p>
<p>Should you then not accept payments from debtors that you fear might file bankruptcy? &nbsp;No. &nbsp;First, the debtor may not file bankruptcy within 90 days and second, you may have a preference defense.</p>
<p>There are some things you can do to put yourself in a better position. &nbsp;First, keep all accounts receivable current. &nbsp;If a client is allowed 30 days to pay and historically has paid within that time frame do not allow payments to fall behind or you are turning a current debt into an old debt. &nbsp;Second, make sure that you keep all of your billing and account receivable records so you can prove payments were received in the normal course of business. &nbsp;Third, become a secured creditor. &nbsp;Fourth, protect your security interest as soon as possible. &nbsp;If you wait too long you may lose your secured creditor advantage. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">With Bankruptcies Rising, the Risk of a Facing a Preference Claim has Gone Up</span></span></strong></p>
<p>In the face of the worse economy since the Great Depression, bankruptcies are soaring for individuals and businesses. &nbsp;When bankruptcies were relatively rare, the odds of you receiving a payment within 90 days of a bankruptcy filing was not all that great. &nbsp;Today, it seems, that all businesses, large and small, are at risk. &nbsp;As a result, it is more likely that you will get caught up in someone's bankruptcy.&nbsp;&nbsp;If you are not careful the bankruptcy court will be looking for you to pay back money received and spent months ago.</p>
<p>Protect yourself the best you can from future preference claims and if you are facing a preference claim make sure that you properly and timely assert your preference defense.</p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<p><strong>NOTICE</strong></p>
<p>The foregoing is not intended to constitute legal advice for any specific circumstance, but is intended to reflect broadly applicable principles, under Minnesota law, relevant to a typical situation. Each set of facts and each contract is, or can be unique; the unique facts and specific language of the contract may require a different legal analysis and may result in a different outcome. Before proceeding in reliance upon this or any other general description of law, consult with an attorney competent in the field of practice relevant to your situation.</p>
<p><strong><span><span>Copyright 2011 Nash Law Firm</span></span></strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.nash-law.com/a-bankruptcy-killer-pay-back/rss-comments-entry-10063029.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
